Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Watching Wormholes Wobble

Another day, another dscan.  Dscan is clear as I log in.  But the probe scanner shows five signatures in my home system.  When I last checked, it was one.  So, it looks like we may have visitors.  Only one way to find out.  I pop probes and start scanning.

The first sig I resolve  is a wormhole, but by its signature strength it is not a K162.  Therefore almost certain to be our static.  I don't fly to it yet because it is possible (though unlikely) that none of the other signatures are wormholes.  And I do not want to unzip mindlessly.  Three more sigs are new gas sites.

Imagine this wobbling (image from Penny)
The last is a second wormhole, and by the fact that I get my 100% resolution at 1 AU probe distance, I know it is in the K162 strength range, and thus must be a K162.  (There are no wormholes with 10% signature strength that can appear in any C4 system other than K162s.)   Since it must be open (being a K162), I am not unzipping any further than I already am by flying to it.  I fly to it.  I find a K162 as expected.  It's blue going to lower wspace -- it's a C2.  And it's wobbling away, end of life.  Well, that's too bad.  C2a will have a highsec connection and we really need to do some logistics.  But not with an EOL wormhole.

Now I check my PI to see if I need to move goo, which is best done as zipped up as possible.  I don't need to do anything.  Great.  I'll instantiate our static and see if I can get a route to highsec that way.  I fly over to the static, being careful to align first so I have the maximum time to get into the next system.  I am in my Manticore; perhaps I will be lucky and surprise someone.  But, no.  The static, like the C2, is in EOL.  Evidently the C2 people searched it down and instantiated it 12+ hours ago.

This sucks.  No way out of my system other than EOL wormholes which I do not know the timing of.  They might pop in a minute, or in five hours.  No way to know, or even to get a decent idea, other than to recall the timing of my last static, but I deleted that bookmark already.

I could use mass to pop the static wormhole to recreate it.  But I am not so keen to play tonight as to want to pop wormholes by myself.  And the thing should vanish on its own if I just wait, on average, 2 hours.  I'll just read a book while I sit watching the C2, which ought to evaporate first.   Bye, EVE, I'll have an eye on you right over here.

It's about 7:30 now.  

8:30.  Wormhole still there.

9:30.  Wormhole still there.  It's kind of running longer than I had expected.  But now it must be short time.

10:30.  Wormhole still there.

11:00.  Shurrrrp!  The wormhole is gone.  Finally!  If I had known how long it was going to be... but I didn't.  No use backprojecting how I'd live differently if I was able to know things about the future. 

1 comment:

  1. You could have borrowed one of our pilots. Although he claims it's just confirmation bias, it seems that dying wormholes tend to collapse within two minutes of his jumping through.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.